Statistics Reports need more fields to allow for better filtering in OJS 3.4

In the new reports, only the following fields are included:

ID | Title | Total | Abstract Views | File Views | PDF | HTML | Other

Previously, additional information such as Issue and Date Published was included, as well as a column for each attachment with its individual statistics. Now, all attachment stats are grouped under “Other.” This made it much easier to focus on a specific issue, subset of articles, or type of attachment directly from the CSV export, without needing additional filters.

While OJS 3.4 has a filter tool and you can technically filter by issue, I’ve tested this on our installation and it does not work correctly — even when filtering by issue, the exported CSV still includes articles outside that issue.

There is also a Files Report, but it has limitations: as noted above I cannot filter by issue, each attachment appears on a new row (would be easier if article and files associated with it is in one row), and the file name is used (rather than the galley name). This makes filtering difficult, since filenames often don’t follow a consistent format.

As a result, I’ve found that I cannot effectively use the reports for tracking stats. I’ve had to manually capture statistics instead, so I can for example include the article information, issue, published date, and stats for each file in a single row — which is much easier to work with.

The previous setup (pre v3.4) provided sufficient information in a single “master list” to allow proper filtering directly from the CSV itself, which was simpler and more reliable.

Would it be possible to restore the additional metadata into a single CSV or improve the filter features so that it works correctly for exports? Even if the issue filter is something that can be fixed, the Files report I do not find useful at all due to the issues I noted earlier.

Hope these are some things to consider for future.

Hi @SAJS09

Thank you for your feature request.

Could you please edit your post following this template? You have many of the same elements there, it just needs to be adjusted to match this structure.

Describe the problem you would like to solve
Example: Our editors need a way to […]

Describe the solution you’d like
Tell us how you would like this problem to be solved.

Who is asking for this feature?
Tell us what kind of users are requesting this feature. Example: Journal Editors, Journal Administrators, Technical Support, Authors, Reviewers, etc.

Additional information
Add any other information or screenshots about the feature request here.

You can use this post as a reference.

I’ve also noted that you have posted several posts in the feature requests category as well - could you also edit those to follow this format, please?

Thank you,

Roger
PKP Team

1 Like

Dear Roger,

Thank you, I will do so, however I’m not able to edit my posts anymore. What would you advise?

Happy to make new posts, if you could delete these three please?

Kind regrads

Nadia

HI @SAJS09,

Thanks for following up. Typically users can edit their own posts by using the pencil on a given post, but in case your account isn’t set up that way maybe what you could do is duplicate your existing post (and re-format it according to our guidelines), and then let me know when you’ve done that, and I’ll delete original post?

-Roger
PKP Team

The following part is the same as Aricles Statistics Filter by Issue not working

“While OJS 3.4 has a filter tool and you can technically filter by issue, I’ve tested this on our installation and it does not work correctly — even when filtering by issue, the exported CSV still includes articles outside that issue.”

Nason

Hi Roger, thank you, yes I wasn’t able to edit, so I’ve created new posts. If you could please therefore delete the three original posts as listed in my earlier thread? Thanks so much.

Hi Nason, thank you for your reply…this post will be deleted, if you could please post your same comments on this new post? Statistics Reports need more fields to allow for better filtering in OJS v3.4

Thank you!