ORCID authorization failure

ikehoe · February 24, 2023, 8:09am

We are using OjS 3.1.2.4. Realize that we have to upgrade and are working on it. The site hosts multiple journals.
So, far i’ve encountered two instances where the ORCID authorization process has stalled. Here’s the message one author is receiving during the publication process

asmecher · February 24, 2023, 4:07pm

Hi @ikehoe,

You’ve probably already seen this similar thread – not sure it’s any help, but linking it here anyway just for completeness’ sake.

@Dulip_Withanage is our expert on all things ORCiD, so I’ll tag him here.

Meanwhile, I’d suggest checking your log file for a message that appeared at the time the user received that message. There should be a message there that indicates more detail about the problem. For OJS 3.1.2, the ORCiD plugin kept its own log file called “orcid.log” in the files directory of the installation.

We technically don’t support OJS 3.1.x, and are shortly going to drop support for 3.2.x as well, so I do suggest prioritizing an upgrade to 3.3.0 LTS! LTS is Long-Term Support, a new release strategy we introduced last year to suit organizations that didn’t want to plan regular upgrades. More details about that here. And I promise, once you get to 3.3.0 or newer, upgrades will become a lot easier.

Regards,
Alec Smecher
Public Knowledge Project Team

Dulip_Withanage · March 4, 2023, 8:22pm

Hi @ikehoe ,

This error explains that there was an error in the authentication process or that the user tried to authenticate twice.

In previous versions of the plugin, this was a generic message, so it is not very clear to the user what exactly happened. In newer versions, I have refined the messages to provide more detail.

I would also recommend upgrading to OJS 3.3 if possible, as we have orcid API v3 support and reviewer credits from 3.3

github.com/pkp/orcidProfile

Reviewer Credits

opened 01:10PM - 06 Jun 21 UTC

closed 04:58PM - 02 Dec 21 UTC

withanage

#### Review functionality https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1921992/1…43842439-6bda500e-ae19-4f38-a983-5dfc9be781a3.mp4 #### Reviewer Anonymity metadata transfer concept | Information | Orcid Field | Anonymous | Open | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1. Date of submission | created-date | YYYY | YYYY-MM-DD | | 2. Date of acceptance (review)| review-completion-date | YYYY | YYYY-MM-DD | | 3. Date of publication | created-date | YYYY | YYYY-MM-DD | | 7. Article URL | review-url | :x: | :heavy_check_mark: | ### Review Functionalitry ### Plugin Settings https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1921992/143787537-28d372e8-8cbf-418f-b91e-633cb9dd76a3.mp4 #### Links - Definition: https://support.orcid.org/hc/en-us/articles/360006971333-Peer-Review - API : https://api.orcid.org/v3.0/#!/Development_Member_API_v3.0/viewPeerReviewv3 - SANDBOX API https://api.sandbox.orcid.org/v3.0/#!/Development_Member_API_v3.0/createPeerReviewv3 - Peer Review Orcid https://github.com/ORCID/ORCID-Source/blob/master/orcid-api-web/tutorial/peer-review.md - Niso group https://www.niso.org/standards-committees/peer-review-taxonomy - marc codes https://www.loc.gov/marc/countries/countries_name.html #### Orcid Review display ![Reviewer-Info](https://support.orcid.org/hc/article_attachments/1500000536682/1.png) - In user profiles, peer-review will be visible only when the user has enabled it. [ref](https://support.orcid.org/hc/en-us/articles/360006897614) #### Specification (from ORCID) ##### a. Information about the reviewer 1. Role (required): The individual’s role in the review process, e.g. chair, editor, member, organizer, **reviewer** :ok: 2. Identifier (required): The reviewer’s **ORCID iD** full orcid URL including https :ok: ##### b. Information about the organizer - Convening organization (required): This describes the organization which organized the review - a **_journal publisher_**, **_conference organizer_**, funding agency, faculty, etc. 3. We can use the Publisher name under Settings- > Journal -> masterhead -> publisher :question: Location 4. City (required): The city where the organizer is based - Region: The region where the organizer is based - Country (required): The country where the organizer is based If I am correct, the only location where the journal address is default maintained is under principal contact. There also we have the mailing address. This can be a little tricky to parse, if the journal managers do not provide it correctly. _Country_ is straight-forward, but the city can be not easy to find. Another possibility is to get the location from the issn. Haven't explored it whether they have an API or does it make sense ? e.g. https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/0006-1387 :question: 5. Identifier (required): The persistent identifier for the organization ISSN of the journal or ROR id of the press / hosting organization :question: ##### c. Information about the review 6. Group (required): An identifier used to group together the reviews on the ORCID record; it describes the group of which the review is part. This could be the name of a journal (Journal of Scientific Investigations) or an organization (Scholarly Publisher, State University) User -> affiliation :question: 7. Type (required): The type of review activity, e.g., a review, evaluation Review :ok: 8. Date (required): When the review was completed. This can be broad (2008) or specific Reveiw data :ok: 9. Review container name: The name of main object of which the review is part, e.g. journal, conference, grant review panel, etc. journal name :ok: 10. Review identifier (required): A unique resolvable identifier provided by the source for the review itself. This is used to prevent duplication of review activity. Reviews can have more than one identifier, and multiple reviews with the same identifier will group together Do we have a reviewer URL for the front-end through a plugin may be :question: References: This plugin sends reviewer id, submission-id,data and (due and submission) to reveiwercredits.com https://www.reviewercredits.com/integrations-for-journals-and-manuscript-platforms/ Related to 10 11, Review URL: A link to the representation of the review online ##### d. Information about the review subject - Review subject name: The title of the item reviewed - Review subject type: The type of item that was reviewed, e.g. article, grant, monograph - Review subject identifier: A unique resolvable identifier for the reviewed item, e.g. a DOI - Review subject URL: A link to the reviewed item online OJS supports all :ok: #### References - https://support.orcid.org/hc/en-us/articles/360006971333-Peer-Review ##### TODO - [x] Check the review round - [x] Check visibility - [x] Sending emails - [x] Update with put code - [x] Deleting submission - [x] Country codes as plugin settings - [ ] #### Related tickets - https://github.com/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/7406 - https://github.com/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/7405 - https://github.com/pkp/pkp-lib/issues/7404

.