Hi @asmecher, thanks for your reply, I hope @felixhelix (and others) will add comments, I think open peer review is critical for the future of open access publishing.
Regarding “continuous publication”, maybe I used the phrase in a wrong way because is connected with version of record, while I wanted to point out that OJS/OMP should manage earlier versions of articles/chapters/books in an open access perspective: talking about articles, in online publishing an increasing number of commercial publishers are starting to publish accepted manuscripts (e.g. Wiley is adding AAM to online firsts, or “First edition” AAMs of Blood Advances in Science Direct like this). Talking about books, my university press has published a postprint of a serie’s book in Zenodo linking to it from OMP: we had to manage the hiding of DOI and chapters (leading to this post), but we thought OMP was an important place to give the notice of the postprint even if not ready to properly manage earlier versions of books.
Best regards
Stefano