If I look for one of its references in SG: I get: Google Scholar
1815-1818–L’occupation russe à Valenciennes et Maubeuge
M Lannoy - … du Cercle Archéologique et Historique de …, 2011 - histoire-valenciennes-cahv.fr
… Références. Bouvry, J… (2016 ). Le siège de Maubeuge (17 mars - 3 Avril 1814) Le siège de
Maubeuge par le prince Auguste de Prusse (20 juin - 12 juillet 1815). Mémoires de la Société
archéologique et Historique de l’Arrondissement d’Avesnes sur Helpe, 40, 19‑60 … (That is the paper)
instead of:
[Citation] Le siège de Maubeuge (17 mars - 3 Avril 1814) Le siège de Maubeuge par le prince Auguste de Prusse (20 juin - 12 juillet 1815) Bouvry, J. Mémoires de la Société archéologique et Historique de l’Arrondissement d’Avesnes sur Helpe 2016
That is dependent on the user because they use reference from you and convert them. I suppose that you cannot do anything about that and it is not under your control how they will represent references. You can contact them and ask for advice.
There’s only automatic relies… giving a link to the page of their FAQ that seems the more related to the question… I feel mine is not in, so… I can’t obtain assistance
I suppose that they do have some scripts that convert from your format to one that they feel appropriate. Well, that is not satisfactory to you.
Maybe this link might be useful for you:
Please contact them and ask them since they can offer you more precise answer.
As far as I know there always ongoing debates on that topic so it is the best to try to contact them directly.
They just send automatic messages, with link to their FAQ, according to what is inside the message… computer analysed…
But my question is not inside their FAQ!
Their message says if it does not help, we could reply to it… but then noone answer the message!!!